The Combat Evolution and Cold War Legacy of USS Dace (SS-247)

The USS Dace (SS-247) represents one of the most storied combat records in the history of the United States Navy’s “Silent Service.” A Gato-class fleet submarine, the Dace distinguished herself as a premier instrument of undersea denial during World War II, earning seven battle stars and the prestigious Navy Unit Commendation. Her operational history is characterized by a high degree of tactical versatility, ranging from aggressive surface gun actions and the destruction of heavy cruisers to specialized commando insertions in enemy territory.

The vessel’s career serves as a historical microcosm for the evolution of American submarine warfare. Her journey reflects the broader transition of the U.S. Submarine Force: originating as a raw, mass-produced WWII fleet combatant and evolving into a specialized Cold War training and anti-submarine warfare (ASW) platform. Through technical modernization and international cooperation, the Dace helped bridge the gap between the era of unrestricted undersea commerce raiding and the sophisticated sonar-driven environment of the NATO alliance.

Continue reading “The Combat Evolution and Cold War Legacy of USS Dace (SS-247)”

The Silent Foundation: The Legacy of USS R-13 (SS-90)

Introduction: The Bridge to Modernity

In the annals of naval history, the most celebrated vessels are often those with the longest lists of enemy ships sunk. However, the true strength of a naval force frequently rests upon the less decorated workhorses that provide the essential foundation for victory. The USS R-13 (SS-90) was exactly such a vessel. An R-1-class coastal defense submarine, she served as the critical “bridge” between the experimental, often unreliable underwater designs of the earlier O-class and the sophisticated fleet boats that dominated the Pacific in World War II.

Over a career spanning 26 years, the R-13 functioned not as a primary combatant, but as a vital laboratory for tactical development and a premier classroom for the men who would eventually lead the “Silent Service.” Her service can be defined by three primary phases:

  • Pacific Tactical Testing: A decade-long deployment in the Hawaiian Territory developing submarine doctrine and fleet integration.
  • Atlantic Training: A tenure at the Submarine School in New London, Connecticut, forging the skills of future wartime commanders.
  • World War II Coastal Defense: Active wartime service protecting vital shipping lanes and perfecting American Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) tactics.

Technical DNA: Specifications of the R-1 Class

The R-class represented a major evolutionary step in American submarine technology, prioritizing improved habitability and mechanical reliability over its predecessors. The R-13 was a robust platform designed to operate in littoral waters and withstand the pressures of a 200-foot test depth.

Physical and Displacement Specifications

CharacteristicMeasurement
Displacement (Surfaced)569 – 574 long tons
Displacement (Submerged)680 – 685 long tons
Length Overall186 feet 2 inches
Beam18 feet
Mean Draft14 feet 6 inches to 15 feet 6 inches
Test Depth200 feet

Propulsion and Engineering

The R-13 utilized a “Dual-System” propulsion arrangement, which was the standard for diesel-electric boats of her era. However, the specific machinery selected for this class often drew scrutiny from contemporary naval engineers.

  • NELSECO Diesel Engines: Two New London Ship and Engine Company 6-EB-14 engines provided 440 brake horsepower each for surface operations and battery charging. These engines were often viewed with skepticism due to their mechanical complexity and significant vibration issues.
  • Electro-Dynamic Company Motors: Two electric motors, each rated at 467 horsepower, provided propulsion while submerged, drawing power from two 60-cell storage batteries.

A unique design feature of the R-class allowed for the loading of fuel into the main ballast tanks. This specialized configuration could extend the vessel’s standard range of 4,700 nautical miles to an impressive 7,000 nautical miles, significantly increasing her strategic reach for long-range transits.

Offensive Capabilities

The ship’s armament was designed for both underwater and surface engagements:

  • Bow Torpedo Tubes: Four 21-inch (533 mm) tubes with a total capacity of eight torpedoes (four in the tubes and four reloads).
  • Deck Gun: One 3-inch/50-caliber gun mounted on the deck for surface combat against small craft or disabled targets.

Origins and Early Service (1918–1920)

The R-13 was born out of the Navy’s buildup during the First World War. She was constructed by the Fore River Shipbuilding Company in Quincy, Massachusetts. Her keel was laid down on March 27, 1918, with the total cost for the hull and machinery reaching $614,641.53.

She was launched on August 27, 1919, sponsored by Miss Fanny Bemis Chandler. On October 17, 1919, the vessel was officially commissioned with Lieutenant Commander Walter E. Boyle in command. Following commissioning, the R-13 conducted an intensive shakedown period and training patrols in the waters off New England and Bermuda to calibrate her systems and train her initial complement of 2 officers and 27 enlisted men.

The Pacific Laboratory: Tactical Development (1920–1930)

In 1920, the R-13 transited the Panama Canal, where she was often observed with a distinctive large white star recognition symbol on her fairwater. On July 17, 1920, she received the official hull designation “SS-90.” She arrived at Pearl Harbor on September 6, 1920, beginning a nine-year tenure in the Hawaiian Territory.

During this decade, the R-13 served as an indispensable platform for tactical development. She was a frequent participant in “Fleet Problems”—large-scale naval exercises that tested submarine stealth and coordinated attacks. These simulations included specific scenarios such as attacks on the Panama Canal, the defense of the Hawaiian Islands, and fleet engagements in the open ocean.

R-13 (SS-90), returning to port. Circa 1930’s. Courtesy of John Hummel & ussubvetsofwwii.org.
(NAVSOURCE.NET)

However, this service came with a significant mechanical and human toll. Operating in tropical environments without modern air conditioning or habitability features meant the crew endured extreme heat and humidity. These challenges provided the Navy with critical data, eventually leading to the prioritization of better living conditions and more robust engineering in future fleet boat designs.

The School Ship: Forging WWII Legends (1931–1941)

Returning to New London on February 9, 1931, the R-13 began what was arguably her most impactful mission: serving as a primary training vessel for the Submarine School. For a decade, the boat served as a stable platform where thousands of sailors and officers mastered the fundamental “manual” of submarine operations.

Future WWII Heroes

The R-13 served as the “junior varsity” for several legendary commanders who would later earn multiple Navy Crosses in the Pacific:

  • Glynn R. Donaho: Served as Navigator from August 1934 to June 1935; he later became one of the most decorated submarine commanders in U.S. history.
  • Mannert L. Abele: Took command of R-13 in February 1937; he later commanded the USS Grunion (SS-216) and was killed in action after sinking three Japanese destroyers in a single day.
July 5, 1943 The Herald News (MA)

This training mission provided the practical environment for mastering periscope techniques, diving procedures, and torpedo maintenance—skills that would prove foundational for the submarine force during the coming war.

Wartime Vigilance: Key West and the Battle of the Atlantic (1941–1945)

In May 1941, the R-13 relocated to Key West, Florida. While newer fleet boats were deployed to the Pacific, the R-13 was tasked with protecting the strategic waterways of the Gulf of Mexico, the Florida Straits, and the Yucatan Channel. These lanes were vital for the transport of oil and bauxite required for the American war effort.

During this high-stakes period, the R-13 was commanded by Antone R. Gallaher (February 1942 to April 1943), who would later command the USS Bang (SS-385) and earn four Navy Crosses.

Beyond patrols, her most grueling wartime task was serving as a sonar target for the Fleet Sound School at Key West and Port Everglades.

  1. The submarine spent countless hours submerged to allow surface crews to practice detection.
  2. This “live” target practice helped American destroyer crews perfect the Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) tactics used to defeat the German U-boat threat.
  3. The boat maintained a high operational tempo despite her advancing age, ensuring that surface forces were combat-ready.

Final Voyage and Operational Legacy

The R-13 was decommissioned on September 14, 1945, shortly after the cessation of hostilities. She was struck from the Navy list on October 11, 1945, and sold for scrap to Macy O. Scott on March 13, 1946.

Though the USS R-13 never fired a torpedo in an engagement, her operational legacy is undeniable. The institutional knowledge gained through her technical trials and the thousands of personnel trained within her hull were the silent pillars upon which the Navy built its eventual victory. She remains a testament to the essential role of the training and coastal fleets in the architecture of national defense.

How USS Mingo Became the First Submarine of Japan’s Postwar Navy | Patrol Reports

Photo courtesy of Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force via Jane's Fighting Ships, 1956-57 courtesy of Robert Hurst.

USS Mingo (SS-261) spent much of her life doing what submarines are built to do: disappear. She slipped beneath the Pacific during the Second World War, hunted Japanese shipping, rescued stranded airmen, survived storms, and eventually faded into the reserve fleet. By all rights, that should have been the end of her story.

Instead, the most unusual chapter came after the shooting stopped.

When people think about the alliance between the United States and Japan, they usually picture diplomats signing treaties, politicians standing before flags, or perhaps photographs of Cold War summits. Very few think about an aging submarine. Yet Mingo helped build that relationship in a way no diplomat ever could. Before she was finished, she would sail under both flags.

The boat began life at the Electric Boat yard in Groton, Connecticut. Her keel was laid on March 21, 1942, at a time when American shipyards were producing warships with astonishing speed. Every slipway seemed occupied. Every launch carried fresh urgency. Mingo entered the water on November 30 and was commissioned on February 12, 1943, under Lieutenant Commander Ralph C. Lynch Jr.

She was a standard Gato-class submarine on paper, although there is a lesson in trusting paper too much. Mingo carried ten torpedo tubes, a deck gun, and enough range to cross vast stretches of ocean without support. Unfortunately, she also carried H.O.R. diesel engines.

Submariners have never been shy about expressing opinions regarding machinery that threatens to leave them stranded hundreds of miles from home. The Hooven-Owens-Rentschler engines developed a reputation throughout the fleet that bordered on legendary. One veteran later joked that the only thing more dangerous than Japanese destroyers was unreliable engineering. Like most sea stories, the line was probably exaggerated. Like most sea stories, there was probably truth hiding inside it.

The Navy eventually replaced Mingo’s troublesome engines with Fairbanks-Morse opposed-piston diesels during a major overhaul. Histories tend to mention that fact in a sentence and move on. The crew almost certainly did not. Reliable machinery is not exciting reading, but ask any submariner which he would rather have, a heroic newspaper headline or engines that actually start.

Mingo sailed west in the summer of 1943 and entered a submarine war that was still finding its footing. The popular image today is one of unstoppable American submarines strangling Japanese commerce. The reality was considerably messier. Torpedoes malfunctioned. Intelligence failed. Captains chased contacts that vanished into weather or darkness. Some patrols produced little more than frustration and paperwork.

Her first patrol took her into waters around the Palau Islands. She attacked merchant shipping when opportunities appeared and even surfaced to bombard Japanese facilities on Sorol Island. There is something almost old-fashioned about a submarine firing her deck gun at a shore target. It sounds more like a scene from the age of sail than the age of radar.

The second patrol ranged across the Marshalls, Carolines, and Marianas. Mingo launched torpedoes at what was believed to be a Japanese carrier and reported hits. Wartime submarine reports are fascinating documents because certainty is often impossible. A captain glimpses explosions, dives to avoid depth charges, and writes his report based on what he believes he saw. Historians arrive decades later and try to sort it all out.

Following overhaul, Mingo returned to sea. Her third patrol in the South China Sea produced little offensive success, although intelligence gathering occupied much of her effort. Such patrols rarely receive much attention. Then again, reconnaissance seldom earns glory. It simply wins wars quietly.

The fourth patrol finally produced a confirmed victory when Mingo sank the destroyer Tamanami off Luzon on July 7, 1944. Destroyers were not helpless merchantmen. They existed for the specific purpose of finding and killing submarines. Every submariner understood that attacking one meant accepting substantial risk.

Then the boat’s mission changed.

By late 1944, Mingo found herself assigned lifeguard duty around Borneo and the Celebes. The term sounds almost comforting until one remembers what it meant. American bombers were operating deep over enemy territory. When crews went down, somebody had to retrieve them before the Japanese did.

Sixteen B-24 airmen found safety aboard Mingo during that patrol. One cannot help wondering what those men saw when the submarine appeared. Relief certainly. Gratitude perhaps. Maybe simple disbelief. A black hull emerging from the sea must have looked less like a warship and more like a miracle.

The patrol offered another reminder that war rarely conforms to expectations. Mingo sank coastal freighters with her deck gun, then survived an accidental attack by an American Liberator bomber. Somewhere there is probably a file folder documenting the incident in neat bureaucratic language. One suspects the conversations aboard Mingo were considerably less polite.

Her most successful offensive patrol came that Christmas. On December 25, 1944, Mingo used radar to conduct a nighttime attack west of Borneo, sinking the tanker Manila Maru.

It is tempting to view such sinkings as isolated victories. They were not. By late 1944, Japanese logistics were collapsing. Every tanker destroyed represented fuel that would never reach aircraft, factories, or warships. The Japanese empire was not merely losing ships. It was losing the ability to move.

Mingo’s final patrol brought a different enemy altogether. On February 10, 1945, she encountered a massive typhoon. The storm inflicted severe structural damage and swept two crewmen overboard. Naval histories sometimes reduce such losses to a sentence. A line in a report. A notation in a casualty list. Two sailors vanished into the sea during a storm and never came home. The war continued. The patrol continued. Families received telegrams. History moved forward because history always moves forward.

When peace arrived, Mingo returned to the United States and entered the reserve fleet. Had she remained there, she would have been remembered as a respectable combat veteran with five battle stars and a handful of notable patrols. That alone would have justified her place in submarine history.

Instead, history took a turn that would have sounded absurd to her wartime crew.

Imagine walking into Mingo’s crew’s mess in 1944 and announcing that within a decade the submarine would belong to Japan. The reaction would probably have involved laughter, disbelief, and perhaps a few colorful observations regarding your sanity.

Yet that is precisely what happened.

In 1955, under the Mutual Defense Assistance Program, the United States transferred Mingo to Japan. Renamed JDS Kuroshio (SS-501), she became the first submarine of the postwar Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force.

The Day, New London, CT, June 21, 1955

That fact alone deserves a moment’s pause.

Some of the Japanese sailors who stepped aboard Kuroshio had lived through the war. Some undoubtedly remembered American submarines from the opposite side of the conflict. Now they were learning their trade aboard one.

History rarely offers cleaner examples of how thoroughly circumstances can change.

For more than a decade, Kuroshio served as a training platform and anti-submarine warfare target. Japanese submariners learned procedures, tactics, maintenance practices, and operational habits aboard a boat built during the greatest naval war in history. The lessons extended far beyond a single submarine. They influenced the development of Japan’s future submarine force and helped establish traditions that continue today.

Ships teach. Sailors teach. Institutions teach. Long after steel begins to age, experience continues traveling from one generation to the next.

Kuroshio’s service ended in 1966. She was returned to American control, later struck from the Naval Register, sold back to Japan, and eventually sunk as a target in 1973.

There is a certain poetry in that ending. The submarine spent her life serving two nations, survived a world war, outlived her original purpose, and helped build something entirely new. Not many warships can make that claim.

USS Mingo earned five battle stars during World War II. She hunted ships, rescued airmen, endured machinery troubles, weathered storms, and carried her crews through years of uncertainty. Those accomplishments matter.

What makes her memorable, though, is the chapter that came afterward. The submarine that once carried war across the Pacific eventually helped train the sailors of a former enemy. Diplomats signed the agreements and politicians made the speeches, but down at the practical level where sailors learn their trade, Mingo became part of the foundation of a new relationship.

That is not the sort of legacy anybody could have predicted in 1943. Which, come to think of it, is one reason history remains worth studying. It keeps refusing to follow the script.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑